Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

X logo

This weekend, X, the platform formerly known as Twitter, began rolling out a highly debated change to its blocking feature. Under this new approach, people you’ve blocked can still view your posts, as well as your followers and following lists—a shift that could potentially increase opportunities for harassment.

Elon Musk, who now owns the company, initially proposed the change in September, arguing that blocking users from seeing public posts “makes no sense.” However, the shift could make it easier for blocked users to keep tabs on others, especially as X now restricts non-logged-in users from freely browsing profiles. Critics argue that this new setup could allow blocked users to continue bothering people even after they’ve been blocked.

In October, X’s engineering team defended the change, suggesting that it would promote “greater transparency.” According to X, blocked users will still be restricted from interacting directly—meaning they can’t follow, like, reply to, repost, or message those who’ve blocked them.

However, some, like Tracy Chou, founder of the anti-harassment tool Block Party, have voiced concerns about the shift. Chou emphasized that creating barriers against unwanted attention, or “friction,” is crucial for online safety, suggesting this new system reduces that protection.

This update could also challenge X’s compliance with app store guidelines. Apple, for example, requires apps with user-generated content to offer “the ability to block abusive users from the service,” which may be questioned under this new system.