Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Source: PYMNTS 

Startups and venture capital (VC) firms are changing how they bank after recent industry turmoil.

Although tech industry players were relieved by Sunday’s announcement by federal regulators that depositors at the failed Silicon Valley Bank will be made whole, they see a need to make changes, The Wall Street Journal (WSJ) reported Monday (March 13).

Among those who were interviewed, founders and investors said they are diversifying bank accounts, moving to bigger banks, opening insured cash-sweep accounts and making certain their balances are under the threshold insured by the FDIC, according to the report.

They’re also scrutinizing other banks with which they do business — looking for signs that they could fail as quickly as Silicon Valley Bank did — and anticipating taking part in board meetings at which they will have to answer questions about what they’re doing to improve their handling of risk, the report said.

The federal regulators’ announcement about deposits at Silicon Valley Bank came faster than many in the industry expected, and companies had been scrambling to gather cash to pay their bills, expecting a weekslong or monthslong delay before hearing a decision on the fate of their funds at Silicon Valley Bank, per the report.

That has served as a wake-up call around cash and risk management practices.

The digital asset industry in particular has found itself unbanked after the collapses of three institutions in five days: tech startup focused Silicon Valley Bank, crypto-catering Silvergate Bank and crypto-friendly lender Signature Bank.

As PYMNTS reported Monday, sector observers have said that the essential de-banking of crypto from 24/7 real-time payment rails may leave the industry with little option but to look to other geographies and jurisdictions.

The domino-effect closings also underscore the challenges faced by small and midsize banks focused on niche lines of business to compete with larger institutions.

Another long-term effect of the closure of Silicon Valley Bank may be that startups have a tougher time doing business.

One startup told The Information that it is concerned about future efforts to raise funds because so many investors banked at Silicon Valley Bank, while another said tech firms might not be able to find another bank that is as willing as Silicon Valley Bank was to work with them when they ran into difficulties.

Source: PYMNTS