Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

iCloud

As reported by the BBC, Apple is facing a significant legal challenge in the UK, with consumer rights group Which? alleging that the company has effectively forced 40 million British users to rely on its iCloud service and overcharges them for it. The lawsuit could result in up to £3 billion in compensation, with each customer potentially receiving an average payout of around £70 if successful.

Apple, however, has denied that its practices are anti-competitive, arguing that customers are not obligated to use iCloud and can access third-party alternatives. The company asserts it “works hard to make data transfer as easy as possible” for users who choose other options.

This claim is part of a broader wave of legal actions against tech giants, which, according to Toby Starr from the law firm Humphries Kerstetter, have “operated without sufficient constraint” until recently. Other companies, such as Facebook, Google, Steam, and leading UK mobile networks, are also facing similar cases in the Competition Appeal Tribunal.

Which? argues that Apple’s pricing for iCloud storage—ranging from £0.99 per month for 50GB to £54.99 per month for 12TB—is exploitative and has effectively locked users into the Apple ecosystem for nearly a decade. Anabel Hoult, CEO of Which?, stated, “Taking this action allows us to help consumers get the compensation they deserve and encourage fairer competition.”

Apple has expressed its intent to contest the claim, maintaining that its iCloud policies are not anti-competitive. Meanwhile, the case is being supported financially by Litigation Capital Management, with the legal firm Willkie Farr & Gallagher representing Which?.

Legal expert Alan Davis from Pinsent Masons noted that similar cases may be on the rise, with litigation funders motivated to back claims that would otherwise struggle financially. Davis emphasized that proving Apple’s alleged market abuse will be challenging, as there is no current EU or UK competition law ruling against Apple for iCloud practices.

With the UK regulator also investigating cloud services, Which? has urged Apple to address consumer concerns without prolonged litigation. However, Apple remains firm in its stance, denying any wrongdoing.